
The Docket
The rulings and rules that
change how firms run.
The rulings, rules, and shifts that change how firms run.

A flooded mine in 1860 still decides who pays when blasting cracks a foundation
Rylands v. Fletcher (1868) made a mill owner pay for a flooded colliery without proof of negligence. U.S. courts still trace strict liability for blasting and other abnormally dangerous activities to it.

California will let jurors 80 and older opt out for good, without a doctor's note
AB 1359 lets a person 80 or older obtain a permanent medical excuse from jury service by written attestation, with no provider letter, starting January 1, 2028. The Judicial Council will write the forms.

New Jersey lawyers must file small claims documents in eCourts starting November 2
A September 30, 2026 Supreme Court order makes eCourts the required channel for attorney filings in New Jersey small claims. JEDS filings will be rejected, and the refiling fee waiver ends February 28, 2027.

Maryland homeowners can now pass a house outside probate with a transfer-on-death deed
Maryland's Transfer-on-Death Deed Act took effect October 1, 2026. The deed must be recorded before the owner dies, a later will cannot revoke it, and the beneficiary takes subject to existing liens.

A federal amicus brief rule was pulled back from the Supreme Court and is back, revised
The rules committees withdrew proposed Appellate Rule 29 on March 10, 2026, then re-presented it without the new-member disclosure. A companion Rule 15 change would end refiling for some agency-review petitions.

Iowa now has practice standards for children's lawyers in CINA and termination cases
The Iowa Supreme Court adopted chapter 64 of its court rules, 18 practice standards for lawyers who represent children in CINA and termination of parental rights cases, effective January 1, 2027.

Oregon's high court says a hallway glimpse of a shackled client called for a mistrial motion
In Nelson v. Cain, the Oregon Supreme Court held 6-1 that a defense lawyer gave inadequate assistance by not moving for a mistrial after jurors saw his client in shackles in a courthouse hallway.

The Fourth Circuit will let pro se parties take service by email
An amendment to Fourth Circuit Local Rule 25, set for October 19, 2026, lets self-represented parties who are not registered e-filers consent to email service. A national proposal is open for comment.

California courts must now record the hearing when no court reporter comes
In Family Violence Appellate Project v. Superior Court, a unanimous California Supreme Court held that litigants who cannot afford a private reporter get an official record on request, by electronic recording if needed.

The criminal subpoena rule is being rewritten to reach hearings, not just trials
Proposed amendments to Criminal Rule 17 would extend third-party subpoenas to detention, suppression, sentencing and revocation hearings and write a loosened Nixon test into the rule. Earliest effective date: December 1, 2027.

The 1863 flour barrel that still lets an accident speak for itself
In Byrne v. Boadle, nobody saw why a barrel fell from a Liverpool loft. The court let the accident itself prove negligence, and res ipsa loquitur still decides which cases reach a jury.

Florida's bar admission rules no longer name the ABA as the only law school accreditor
Amended Rule 4-13.2 took effect October 1, 2026. ABA graduates stay eligible, a second accreditation path opens, and the intern, paralegal and military spouse rules now follow the same definition.

Pennsylvania's no-duty rule reached a disease diagnosed decades after the game
In Schretzman v. NCAA, the Superior Court affirmed a nonsuit against a former West Point football player with ALS. The inherent risk was the head impact, not the diagnosis that came decades later.

Maryland fiduciaries keep the privilege even when the estate pays the lawyer
New Estates and Trusts § 15-117, in force October 1, 2026, keeps fiduciary-counsel communications privileged when trust or estate funds pay the lawyer. The beneficiary relationship is not a waiver.

Virginia's former-client conflict rule now has an exception for criminal records
Amended Rule 1.9(c)(1), effective July 27, 2026, lets a lawyer use a former client's criminal history found in law enforcement databases or court records. The reveal clause did not change.

The federal affidavit for appealing without fees shrinks to two pages on December 1
Revised Appellate Form 4 replaces a multi-page financial questionnaire with eight questions. The spouse tables and itemized expenses are gone, and the issues on appeal now come first.

The bankruptcy course certificate loses its filing deadline on December 1
Amended Bankruptcy Rules 1007, 5009 and 9006 drop the fixed deadline for the financial-management course certificate and add two clerk's notices. The course is still a condition of discharge.

The ABA just rewrote its guidance on clients with decision-making limitations
Formal Opinion 525 replaces the 1996 diminished-capacity opinion. The client still directs the objectives, supports come before protective action, and guardianship is the last resort.

Colorado just rewrote the ethics rule for one-visit legal clinics
Amended Colo. RPC 6.5 takes effect October 1, 2026. Consent to limited scope moves into the rule, a program's intake can satisfy it, and fee, file and termination duties now switch on only under stated conditions.

What a legal answering service costs, and why an AI minute is not billed like a human one
Seven vendors, read at their own pricing pages. Five publish minute-based US dollar tiers, one bills per answered call, and one sends US buyers straight to a quote request. Abby's own accounting prices an AI-answered minute at half of a human-answered one.

The sheep that never changed hands in 1601 still tell a jury what fraud looks like
A farmer signed his whole flock over for a real debt, then kept shearing it. The six signs a court read out of that in 1601 are now eleven numbered factors in a California statute.

What legal AI tools cost, and how many vendors publish no price at all
Eight legal AI vendors, read at their own pricing pages. Three publish a real per-user number. Five publish none, and two of those five keep a pricing page that has no figure on it.

Massachusetts just turned its frivolous-appeal rule into a fee-and-costs rule
The Supreme Judicial Court deleted Mass. R. A. P. 25 and inserted a new one, effective September 1, 2026. The frivolous-appeal sanction is now one ground of two, and the 14-day clock starts when the court grants the request.

What law firm intake automation actually automates, and where the software stops
Intake software runs the mechanical steps. The conflict check it runs is a search, and one vendor's own documentation says a person still approves or denies the result. Rule 5.3 reaches the vendor too.

New Jersey wrote down when cashing the check still leaves you an appeal
A new paragraph of Rule 4:48-1, effective September 1, 2026, sets two conditions for appealing after accepting payment of a final judgment. It codifies Brehme v. Irwin, where the moment that mattered was the day the warrant was signed.

What belongs on a law firm client intake form, and the rule behind each field
The genuinely free templates come from bar programs, under licenses narrower than most firms notice. What goes into the fields is set elsewhere: Model Rule 1.18, 45 CFR 164.508, the E-SIGN Act, and the ADA's own list of public accommodations.

Iowa just made guardianship reports confidential, and put access on a request form
An Iowa Supreme Court order effective September 7, 2026 designates the background-check, plan, inventory and report forms in adult guardianship and all conservatorship proceedings as confidential. Whether the clerk hands over a copy is decided by what the petition said the day it was filed.

The law firm intake process, step by step, and where the duties attach
A person becomes a prospective client by consulting a lawyer, with no fee and no engagement letter. Rule 1.18 then governs what the firm may hear, the amended Rule 1.16(a) governs what it must ask, and Rule 5.3 puts the intake script on the lawyer.

The 100-mile subpoena limit would be measured from the witness, not the court
A 2023 Ninth Circuit decision kept Rule 45's 100-mile radius pinned to the courthouse even when the witness appeared by video. A proposed rewrite would move the measurement, name four ways to serve a subpoena, and require 14 days' notice. Three consequences for practicing attorneys.

What MyCase costs now, and what changed between April and June
The vendor's pricing page lists Basic at $50 per user per month, Pro at $100 and Advanced at $130 on annual billing. A capture of the same page from April 12 lists $39, $89 and $109. What moved, and what sits outside the seat rate.

A 1938 railroad case still decides whose law your federal court applies
Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins overruled ninety-six years of Swift v. Tyson and held there is no federal general common law. In Berk v. Choy, decided January 20, 2026, the same framework kept a Delaware affidavit out of federal court.

What Clio actually costs, now that only one number is published
One price appears on the vendor's own pricing page: $49 per user per month on the entry plan. The three plans above it show a Get pricing button. What the January captures showed, what came off the page during 2026, and what is still published.

Texas trial courts start reporting whether they ruled on time
Senate Bill 293 put deadlines on Texas trial courts for summary judgment, a completely rewritten Rule 166a carried them into practice on March 1, and the first quarterly compliance reports are due September 20. Three consequences for practicing attorneys.

The Clio alternatives a small firm can price without calling sales
Six practice management vendors publish a per-user rate you can read in ten seconds. Three publish none at all. What the published numbers include, what sits outside them, and the terms to pin down before signing.

Illinois will let courts weigh a pet's well-being when the owners never married
Public Act 104-0613 writes companion animals into the replevin article of the Code of Civil Procedure, lets a court consider the animal's well-being whatever the parties' legal status, and says ownership documentation may not decide it alone. Three consequences for practicing attorneys.

Dropping one claim would no longer mean dropping the whole case
An amendment to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) has cleared the Standing Committee and is before the Judicial Conference. It would let a plaintiff voluntarily dismiss one or more claims rather than only an entire action. Three consequences for practicing attorneys.

Federal filings may have to redact the whole Social Security number
Privacy amendments published for comment on August 14 would end the last four digits convention in civil and criminal filings, swap a minor's initials for a pseudonym, and say on the face of the rule that redaction reaches exhibits and attachments. Three consequences for practicing attorneys.

Washington will admit some new lawyers without a bar exam score
A venue technology failure stopped the country's first NextGen bar exam before day one began in Yakima. Three emergency orders later, part of the July 2026 class is admitted by court order rather than by score. Three consequences for practicing attorneys.

A $1,600 charge disallowed in 1796 still decides who pays your fees
The Supreme Court's report in Arcambel v. Wiseman runs a few sentences and never names a doctrine. It is still the citation the Court reaches for when it explains where the American Rule came from, and a unanimous 2019 decision shows how demanding that rule remains.

Florida initial briefs now have to state their own jurisdiction
A corrected June 11 order amended four Florida appellate rules. Since September 1, the initial brief opens with a jurisdictional statement, and every issue needs a record citation showing where it was preserved. Three consequences for practicing attorneys.

The judiciary just told judges to ask who else is paying their interns
A federal ethics committee published Advisory Opinion No. 119 this month, its first squarely on law firm stipends paid to the unpaid students who work in judges' chambers. The answer turns on one question, and timing is only half of it. Three consequences for practicing attorneys.

The Supreme Court now needs the ticker symbol, not just the party name
In January a Justice left an argued case over a company that had dropped out of the caption but was still a party in the district court. A month later the Court revised four of its filing rules, and one unrelated line changed what counts as filing on time. Three consequences for practicing attorneys.

Illinois is changing what a limited law license can lead to
One order entered April 14, 2026 amended five Illinois admission rules on three effective dates. The eighteen-month ceiling on a legal aid lawyer's limited license is gone, the time under it now counts toward admission on motion, and a course requirement lands October 1. Three consequences for practicing attorneys.

Virginia is changing who controls a case during an interlocutory appeal
A Virginia circuit court has kept concurrent jurisdiction during most interlocutory appeals since 2021. An order entered July 17, 2026 rewrites Rule 1:1C, and on September 15 the appellate court takes exclusive control of the appealed order in five kinds of case. Three consequences for practicing attorneys.

The jury selection rule that reached only three kinds of civil case
California's peremptory challenge statute was written in 2020 to take over civil jury selection on January 1, 2026. Senate Bill 645 deleted that date and named three categories of civil case instead. Three consequences for practicing attorneys.

Bankruptcy is getting its own standard for testimony by video
Three linked amendments effective December 1, 2026 pull bankruptcy contested matters out from under Civil Rule 43. A witness appearing from another location will need cause and appropriate safeguards, not compelling circumstances. Three consequences for practicing attorneys.

California is rewriting what counts as serving a summons
A defendant learned about a $486,528 default judgment in 2020, when his wages were garnished. The Supreme Court of California held in 2024 that no deadline barred his challenge, and the Legislature then rewrote the service statutes. Three consequences for practicing attorneys.

A $2 million sanction turned on the wall between a consultant and an expert
A federal judge in Georgia sanctioned a defendant a third time for withholding evidence, finding a litigation consultant's testing reproduced inside the testifying expert's report. Reuters reported this month that two law firms were ordered to pay $2 million. Three consequences for practicing attorneys.

A lie detector rejected in 1923 still decides which experts a jury hears
A Washington murder defendant asked a court to let a blood pressure machine vouch for him. The judges said no, in under a thousand words, and wrote the general-acceptance test that still keeps novel science out of courtrooms in California, New York, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Washington, and Minnesota.

New Jersey just adopted the conflict rule it turned down in 2003
The Supreme Court of New Jersey amended RPC 1.8 on July 23, 2026 to add a new paragraph (k) barring sexual relations with a client absent a relationship that predates the representation, and extended it to an entity client's litigation control group. Three consequences for practicing attorneys.

The hearsay rule is losing its oath requirement on December 1
The Supreme Court adopted an amendment to Federal Rule of Evidence 801 on April 8, 2026, deleting the requirement that a witness's earlier inconsistent statement have been made under penalty of perjury before a jury may treat it as proof. Three consequences for practicing attorneys.

Law schools just got three more years to admit students without the LSAT
The ABA's Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar Council voted to extend by three years the window for law schools to apply for a variance letting them admit students without a standardized test score, an option first authorized in 2024 and currently used by 21 schools.

New York just rewrote the rules for lawyer advertising and solicitation
New York's Appellate Division replaced a long list of detailed, format-specific advertising requirements with a single false-or-misleading standard, and dropped the 30-day pause on soliciting people about a specific accident. Three consequences for practicing attorneys.

A federal court that sends a case to arbitration keeps the case
The Supreme Court unanimously held that a federal court which stays a case for arbitration keeps jurisdiction to later confirm or vacate the resulting award, narrowing the practical reach of Badgerow v. Walters. Three consequences for practicing attorneys.

Class action lawyers deserve to be paid, a court just said
A $3.7 million class action fee award has now been vacated twice by the Third Circuit. The second ruling holds that Perdue's limits on lodestar multipliers reach contractual fee-shifting settlements, not just statutory ones. Three consequences for practicing attorneys.

A 1917 endorsement deal with no promise in it still shapes your contracts
Lucy, Lady Duff-Gordon, sold the exclusive right to market her name, then peddled her own endorsement and kept the money. She argued there was no contract, because the other side had promised nothing. Wood v. Lucy, and the implied promise Cardozo found in it, still governs exclusive deals.

A broken mill shaft in 1854 still decides which losses you can recover
When a Gloucester flour mill stopped and a carrier was late returning the broken part, the miller sued for the profits lost while the wheels stood still. Hadley v. Baxendale set the rule that still limits which losses a broken contract makes a party pay for.

The rule so hard that getting it wrong wasn't malpractice
In 1961 the California Supreme Court excused a lawyer who botched the Rule Against Perpetuities, because the rule was too treacherous to expect anyone to get right. The same case, Lucas v. Hamm, first let will beneficiaries sue a drafter who was never their lawyer.

A California court just said "potential" conflicts can void your fee agreement
A published Court of Appeal opinion extends Sheppard v. J-M Manufacturing to potential, not just actual, conflicts of interest: an undisclosed one voided a firm's own engagement agreement and arbitration clause. Three consequences for practicing attorneys.

The file that lived in one person's head
Every firm has one person who knows a matter cold: the deadlines, the ex-husband's name, why the client cries when you mention the house. Then she takes a week off, and the firm learns how much of the file was never written down.

The advertisement that a court turned into a contract
In 1891 a company promised £100 to anyone who used its flu remedy and caught influenza anyway. When a London woman did exactly that and sued, Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co gave the common law its most famous lesson in when an advertisement becomes a binding contract.

The fox hunt that still decides who owns what
In 1805, two Long Island men fought to New York's highest court over a near-worthless dead fox. Pierson v. Post, and the rule it wrote, that pursuit is not possession, still decides who owns oil, gas, groundwater, and wild game.

A law from 1677 still decides which promises must be in writing
An English statute passed against perjury in 1677 is the reason a court may refuse to enforce a deal you can prove was real. It survives in every state's law and in the UCC. What it covers, and the exceptions.

California's high court just changed how attorneys remove a judge
The California Supreme Court partially overruled 50-year-old precedent, opening blanket peremptory judicial challenges under section 170.6 to review for the first time since 1977. Three consequences for practicing attorneys.

The package that set the reach of negligence
A man ran for a moving train, a guard pushed him aboard, and a parcel of fireworks fell. The 1928 case that followed, Palsgraf, gave American law its most argued-over test for how far a careless act reaches.

After hours isn't after the client stops needing you
79% of clients expect a reply within 24 hours, and 68% expect some contact outside business hours, per Clio's 2019 and 2022 Legal Trends Reports. What the after-hours gap actually requires to close.

The shot that forced the law to define insanity
In 1843 a man fired at the wrong target on a London street. The killing made judges write down, for the first time, exactly when a person is too ill to be guilty.

When a click became a signature
A typed name or a clicked 'I agree' can bind you as firmly as ink. The ESIGN Act and UETA settled that a generation ago. What makes an e-signature valid, what still needs wet ink, and the consent step firms miss.

The rule that gave homicide a deadline
For centuries, a death that came more than a year and a day after the blow could not be murder. Medicine made the rule obsolete, and in 2001 the Supreme Court let a state erase it.

The bar exam just changed for the first time in a generation
This July, ten US jurisdictions gave the NextGen bar exam for the first time. It tests fewer memorized subjects and more of what lawyers actually do. Here is what changed.

Someone called 500 law firms. Most didn't answer.
Researchers posing as new clients secretly shopped 500 law firms: 40% answered the phone, 48% were unreachable entirely. The verified numbers on what callers actually reward.

The form that almost got filled out
A late-night visitor hits a case-number field she can't fill and a dropdown she doesn't understand. She closes the tab. The firm never knows the form was started at all.

The consult who said yes, then went quiet for a week
A prospect confirms her consult, sounds committed, then goes silent for a week. The firm assumes she moved on. She was waiting to be told what happens next.

The call that never rang
A scared caller finally dials a law firm at 9:40 p.m., hits a phone tree built for people who already know where they're going, and hangs up. What she needed was a conversation, not a menu.

The case you never knew you lost
Every firm can name the clients it signed. Almost none can name the ones who called once, heard nothing, and moved on: the only loss in a practice that never announces itself.

The decision that never left the room
Your Tuesday meeting made three good decisions. By the following Tuesday, two of them exist only as what four people separately remember agreeing to.

The client who called in Spanish
More than one in four Californians speaks Spanish at home. When one of them calls a firm that answers in English only, the consultation is over in the first nine seconds.

The billable hour that never happened
At 6:10 p.m. you rebuild your day from sent mail and a call log. The eleven-minute call that solved everything isn't in either place.
New pieces are published regularly. Want them in your inbox? Tell us.
Archivar
Run your firm on one memory.
See what one AI platform can do for your firm, live, on your own practice area.
Full platform access · built for compliance